Triple
T1344631
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rangers F.C. |
E28540
|
entity |
| Predicate | primaryRivalryType |
P8277
|
FINISHED |
| Object | city rivalry |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: city rivalry | Statement: [Rangers F.C., primaryRivalryType, city rivalry]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: primaryRivalryType Context triple: [Rangers F.C., primaryRivalryType, city rivalry]
-
A.
primaryCompetition
Indicates that one entity is the main or most significant competitor of another within a given market, domain, or context.
-
B.
rivalryName
Indicates that a specific name or label is assigned to a rivalry relationship between two entities.
-
C.
hasRivalryAspect
chosen
Indicates that there exists a competitive or adversarial relationship or dimension between entities.
-
D.
divisionRivalry
Indicates a competitive or adversarial relationship between entities that belong to the same division or subgroup within a larger organization or system.
-
E.
rivalOf
Indicates a relationship in which two entities compete against or oppose each other, often seeking advantage in the same domain or objective.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49854eb3481908c7d56b2e449a290 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c23d696c8190bb688274280cb680 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bef3e8fc8190ac9a1ba9b5879483 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:56 p.m.