Triple

T13421236
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bernard de Jussieu E313362 entity
Predicate hasHonorificNameInTaxon P109843 FINISHED
Object Jussieua LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jussieua | Statement: [Bernard de Jussieu, hasHonorificNameInTaxon, Jussieua]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHonorificNameInTaxon
Context triple: [Bernard de Jussieu, hasHonorificNameInTaxon, Jussieua]
  • A. hasHonorificName
    Indicates that an entity is referred to by a formal or respectful title or name used as an honorific.
  • B. hasHonorificNameIn
    Indicates that an entity is referred to by a specific honorific or respectful name within a particular language, culture, or contextual setting.
  • C. hasHonorificFrom
    Indicates that one entity uses or receives a particular honorific title or form of address originating from another entity or source.
  • D. hasHonorificType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or category of honorific title or form of address.
  • E. isHonorific
    Indicates that one entity functions as an honorific title or respectful form of address applied to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806ad0c44819088833ae1ec9e9690 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbaeb98e808190948013e8f24779c6 completed April 12, 2026, 2:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9a0355de48190bb3fb96912e20df3 completed April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dadcce5a808190847f2a7833b67a5a completed April 11, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:39 p.m.