Triple
T13418992
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ribera del Duero |
E313288
|
entity |
| Predicate | synonymOfTempranillo |
P52213
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tinta del País |
E914777
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tinta del País | Statement: [Ribera del Duero, synonymOfTempranillo, Tinta del País]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tinta del País Context triple: [Ribera del Duero, synonymOfTempranillo, Tinta del País]
-
A.
Tinta Negra
Tinta Negra is a versatile red grape variety primarily grown on the island of Madeira and widely used to produce a range of styles in Madeira wine.
-
B.
Los Monegros
Los Monegros is a semi-arid comarca in northeastern Spain, known for its steppe landscapes, sparse population, and unique biodiversity.
-
C.
Tinta de Toro
chosen
Tinta de Toro is a local Tempranillo clone known for producing powerful, deeply colored red wines in Spain’s Toro region.
-
D.
Malpica de Bergantiños
Malpica de Bergantiños is a coastal municipality in the province of A Coruña, Galicia, Spain, known for its fishing tradition and rugged Atlantic shoreline.
-
E.
Alfarràs
Alfarràs is a small municipality in the comarca of Segrià in Catalonia, northeastern Spain.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806ad0c44819088833ae1ec9e9690 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dbaeb8416c8190a00dde0917c26f51 |
completed | April 12, 2026, 2:39 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f73082a2548190aefc0f202b84165c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:39 p.m.