Triple

T13405920
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Carse of Gowrie E319955 entity
Predicate hasNotableProduce P26032 FINISHED
Object Carse of Gowrie apples LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Carse of Gowrie apples | Statement: [Carse of Gowrie, hasNotableProduce, Carse of Gowrie apples]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNotableProduce
Context triple: [Carse of Gowrie, hasNotableProduce, Carse of Gowrie apples]
  • A. hasProduction chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or responsible for, the creation or manufacture of another entity or product.
  • B. doesNotProduce
    Indicates that one entity fails to generate, create, or yield another entity or outcome.
  • C. hasProductionValue
    Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a particular level or type of production quality or cost.
  • D. hasNotableComposition
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific composition (e.g., musical, artistic, or written work) that is considered notable or significant.
  • E. hasNotableFeature
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b943cc8190b6af624d385d7e12 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69dbae4be498819094798473a1bfd853 completed April 12, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9a0355de48190bb3fb96912e20df3 completed April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:34 p.m.