Triple
T13389680
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Allied Forces Northern Europe |
E319541
|
entity |
| Predicate | coordinatesDefenseOf |
P17294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Norway and Denmark within NATO |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Norway and Denmark within NATO | Statement: [Allied Forces Northern Europe, coordinatesDefenseOf, Norway and Denmark within NATO]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coordinatesDefenseOf Context triple: [Allied Forces Northern Europe, coordinatesDefenseOf, Norway and Denmark within NATO]
-
A.
coordinatesDefenseSupport
chosen
Indicates organizing and directing defensive assistance or protective actions among involved entities.
-
B.
defends
Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
-
C.
defendedOn
Indicates that one entity protected, supported, or argued in favor of another entity during a specific time or event.
-
D.
defendedAs
Indicates that one entity is presented, argued, or justified as being equivalent to or serving the role of another entity in a defensive or protective context.
-
E.
partyForDefense
Indicates a legal relationship where an entity serves as or is designated as the defending party in a legal proceeding or dispute.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b886bc8190b676e7768b8e01c5 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69dba0d543348190a9c1be509b015c0f |
completed | April 12, 2026, 1:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9a03189908190a784a2755f8d81e1 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:34 p.m.