Triple

T13364357
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lechitic languages E318898 entity
Predicate majorStandardLanguage P109632 FINISHED
Object Polish language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Polish language | Statement: [Lechitic languages, majorStandardLanguage, Polish language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: majorStandardLanguage
Context triple: [Lechitic languages, majorStandardLanguage, Polish language]
  • A. standardLanguageOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the officially recognized or commonly used standard language for another entity (such as a country, region, or organization).
  • B. languageStandard
    Indicates that one entity conforms to, is defined by, or is governed by the language rules, specifications, or conventions established by another entity as a standard.
  • C. nationalLanguageStandardizedIn
    Indicates that a national language has been formally standardized or codified within a particular country or jurisdiction.
  • D. shareMajorLanguage
    Indicates that the entities have at least one primary or major language in common.
  • E. officialLanguage
    Indicates that a particular language has been formally designated by an authority as the official language used for government, legal, or administrative purposes in a given jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b7bbac8190b85278c87fa7aff3 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69da628c71ac81908cfa36342077766e completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9a02c9abc8190b328e7bae747bfc5 completed April 11, 2026, 1:13 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69dadcce5a808190847f2a7833b67a5a completed April 11, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:32 p.m.