Triple
T13353187
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slovakia–Hungary border |
E318118
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDirectionGeneral |
P30196
|
FINISHED |
| Object | west–east |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: west–east | Statement: [Slovakia–Hungary border, hasDirectionGeneral, west–east]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDirectionGeneral Context triple: [Slovakia–Hungary border, hasDirectionGeneral, west–east]
-
A.
containsDirectionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses the directional orientation or path associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasDirectionType
chosen
Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a specific type or category of direction.
-
C.
hasDirectionVariant
Indicates that one entity is a directional variant or orientation-specific form of another entity.
-
D.
hasDirectionVariability
Indicates that the direction associated with an entity or process is not fixed but varies over time, space, or conditions.
-
E.
directionBy
Indicates that one entity provides directional guidance, orientation, or navigational reference for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e8d520881908aa23c7102b72b72 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98f6fd8bc819086dddb6f376efa57 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:32 p.m.