Triple
T13353176
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slovakia–Hungary border |
E318118
|
entity |
| Predicate | crossesRiver |
P416
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ipeľ River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ipeľ River | Statement: [Slovakia–Hungary border, crossesRiver, Ipeľ River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ipeľ River Context triple: [Slovakia–Hungary border, crossesRiver, Ipeľ River]
-
A.
Ipeľ River
chosen
The Ipeľ River is a tributary of the Danube in Central Europe that forms part of the border between Slovakia and Hungary.
-
B.
Regalica River
The Regalica River is a distributary of the Oder River in northwestern Poland that flows through the city of Szczecin and forms part of its important inland waterway system.
-
C.
Pagladia River
Pagladia River is a tributary watercourse in northeastern India that feeds into the Manas River within the Brahmaputra river system.
-
D.
Olza River
The Olza River is a Central European river that flows through the historical region of Cieszyn Silesia, forming part of the border between Poland and the Czech Republic.
-
E.
Spila River
The Spila River is a watercourse in Montenegro that flows into the scenic Bay of Kotor on the Adriatic coast.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e8d520881908aa23c7102b72b72 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:32 p.m.