Triple
T13350729
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wings of Desire |
E318060
|
entity |
| Predicate | discussesPhilosophicalTopic |
P3051
|
FINISHED |
| Object | existentialism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: existentialism | Statement: [Wings of Desire, discussesPhilosophicalTopic, existentialism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: discussesPhilosophicalTopic Context triple: [Wings of Desire, discussesPhilosophicalTopic, existentialism]
-
A.
philosophicalTheme
chosen
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
B.
discussesThinker
Indicates that one entity engages in discussion or analysis about a particular thinker or philosopher.
-
C.
hasPhilosophyAbout
Indicates that one entity holds, develops, or expresses a philosophical view, theory, or stance concerning another entity or subject.
-
D.
hasPhilosophicalInterestIn
Indicates that one entity holds a philosophical curiosity, concern, or engagement regarding another entity.
-
E.
philosophicalConcept
Indicates that one entity is a philosophical concept that characterizes, explains, or is thematically central to the other entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e8c2f1c819094f0970f35f18afa |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98f6e53d88190bd6aa42f69b10ffb |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.