Triple
T13350119
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2004 USS Nimitz incident |
E318046
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusOfExplanation |
P127
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unresolved |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unresolved | Statement: [2004 USS Nimitz incident, statusOfExplanation, unresolved]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusOfExplanation Context triple: [2004 USS Nimitz incident, statusOfExplanation, unresolved]
-
A.
hasOfficialExplanation
Indicates that an entity is accompanied by an authoritative or formally recognized explanation clarifying its reason, cause, or details.
-
B.
status
chosen
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
-
C.
statusDetermines
Indicates that the status or condition of one entity determines or governs the state, outcome, or behavior of another entity.
-
D.
statusIndicates
Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
-
E.
statusModel
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular status representation or status-handling model.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e8c2f1c819094f0970f35f18afa |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98f6e53d88190bd6aa42f69b10ffb |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.