Triple

T13350059
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1997 Phoenix Lights E318045 entity
Predicate hasLaterGovernorStatement P109143 FINISHED
Object later described the object as otherworldly LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: later described the object as otherworldly | Statement: [1997 Phoenix Lights, hasLaterGovernorStatement, later described the object as otherworldly]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLaterGovernorStatement
Context triple: [1997 Phoenix Lights, hasLaterGovernorStatement, later described the object as otherworldly]
  • A. laterGovernor
    Indicates that one entity subsequently became the governor of a place or jurisdiction associated with another entity.
  • B. hasResidentGovernor
    Indicates that a place or territory has an officially appointed governor who resides there and exercises governing authority over it.
  • C. hadGovernor
    Indicates that an administrative region or political entity was governed by a specific person who held the office of governor.
  • D. servedAsGovernorUntil
    Indicates that an entity held the position of governor up to a specified end date or time.
  • E. hasGovernedWith
    Indicates a relationship where two or more entities have jointly exercised governing authority or shared responsibility in ruling or managing a domain or organization.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d99e8c2f1c819094f0970f35f18afa completed April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98f6e53d88190bd6aa42f69b10ffb completed April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d99073e4708190843bda3a1ae78f43 completed April 11, 2026, 12:06 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.