Triple
T13348435
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ruthless Aggression era |
E318013
|
entity |
| Predicate | styleComparedToAttitudeEra |
P109116
|
FINISHED |
| Object | less reliance on shock value |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: less reliance on shock value | Statement: [Ruthless Aggression era, styleComparedToAttitudeEra, less reliance on shock value]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: styleComparedToAttitudeEra Context triple: [Ruthless Aggression era, styleComparedToAttitudeEra, less reliance on shock value]
-
A.
targetAudienceEra
Indicates the historical period or era for which something (such as a work, product, or message) is primarily intended or designed as its audience.
-
B.
stylePeriod
Indicates the stylistic or historical period with which an entity (such as an artwork, artifact, or performance) is associated.
-
C.
historicalComparison
Indicates a relationship where one entity is evaluated or contrasted with another in terms of their characteristics, significance, or context across different historical periods.
-
D.
visualEra
Indicates the historical or stylistic period to which the visual appearance or design of something belongs.
-
E.
styleComparedToEthics
Indicates how one entity’s style is evaluated or characterized in relation to ethical principles or standards.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e8b28e48190a23194e03a74b41b |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98f6e53d88190bd6aa42f69b10ffb |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d99073e4708190843bda3a1ae78f43 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.