Triple
T13347314
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gmina Jordanów |
E317985
|
entity |
| Predicate | bordersWith |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Pcim |
E777660
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Pcim | Statement: [Gmina Jordanów, bordersWith, Gmina Pcim]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Pcim Context triple: [Gmina Jordanów, bordersWith, Gmina Pcim]
-
A.
Gmina Pcim
chosen
Gmina Pcim is a rural administrative district in southern Poland, located in Myślenice County within the Lesser Poland Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Puńsk
Gmina Puńsk is a rural administrative district in northeastern Poland, near the Lithuanian border, known for its significant Lithuanian minority and bilingual cultural character.
-
C.
Gmina Piecki
Gmina Piecki is a rural administrative district in northern Poland, known for its lakes and forests within the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
-
D.
Gmina Ćmielów
Gmina Ćmielów is an administrative rural-urban district in south-central Poland, centered on the town of Ćmielów and known for its traditional porcelain industry.
-
E.
Gmina Pińczów
Gmina Pińczów is an administrative district (gmina) in south-central Poland that includes the town of Pińczów and surrounding rural areas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e89c65c819093f3bea11d6073c5 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f71f45c9788190b60095c0d6e2f763 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:11 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.