Triple
T13345139
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lewis Tappan |
E317928
|
entity |
| Predicate | participantIn |
P149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Amistad case |
E675271
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Amistad case | Statement: [Lewis Tappan, participantIn, Amistad case]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Amistad case Context triple: [Lewis Tappan, participantIn, Amistad case]
-
A.
United States v. The Amistad
chosen
United States v. The Amistad is an 1841 U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled in favor of African captives who had revolted aboard the Spanish schooner La Amistad, recognizing their right to fight for their freedom.
-
B.
Sacco and Vanzetti case
The Sacco and Vanzetti case was a highly controversial 1920s American murder trial of two Italian immigrant anarchists that became a global symbol of alleged judicial bias, anti-immigrant sentiment, and political injustice.
-
C.
Anthony Burns case
The Anthony Burns case was a highly publicized 1854 fugitive slave rendition in Boston that galvanized Northern abolitionist sentiment and intensified national tensions over slavery.
-
D.
Worcester v. Georgia
Worcester v. Georgia was an 1832 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that states had no authority to impose laws on Native American tribal lands, affirming tribal sovereignty in the face of federal Indian Removal policies.
-
E.
Dred Scott v. Sandford
Dred Scott v. Sandford was an 1857 U.S. Supreme Court decision that infamously denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans and helped accelerate tensions leading to the Civil War.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99e89c65c819093f3bea11d6073c5 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 1:06 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f71f439b3c8190b35fd4d097d65068 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:11 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.