Triple
T13339832
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minister without Portfolio of Israel |
E317794
|
entity |
| Predicate | canHoldAdditionalPortfolio |
P109091
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Minister without Portfolio of Israel, canHoldAdditionalPortfolio, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canHoldAdditionalPortfolio Context triple: [Minister without Portfolio of Israel, canHoldAdditionalPortfolio, true]
-
A.
canHold
Indicates that one entity has the capacity or ability to contain, support, or carry another entity.
-
B.
canHoldAdditionalChargeOf
Indicates that one entity has the capacity to store or accommodate an additional specified amount of electric charge beyond its current level.
-
C.
hasOwnerOtherSportsHoldings
Indicates that the owner of the primary entity also owns other sports-related holdings or franchises.
-
D.
canBeHeldWith
Indicates that two entities are compatible or suitable to be held or used together at the same time.
-
E.
portfolioHeldBy
Indicates that a particular portfolio is owned, managed, or maintained by a specified entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99d01bf8481908cd3a99e5557b972 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98f6e53d88190bd6aa42f69b10ffb |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d99073e4708190843bda3a1ae78f43 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:06 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.