Triple

T13336171
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Henry Baldwin E317697 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge E276815 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge | Statement: [Henry Baldwin, notableCase, Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge
Context triple: [Henry Baldwin, notableCase, Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge]
  • A. Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge chosen
    Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge was an 1837 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited implied corporate rights in public charters and affirmed states’ power to promote the public interest over private monopoly claims.
  • B. Charles River Bridge et al. v. Warren Bridge et al.
    Charles River Bridge et al. v. Warren Bridge et al. is an 1837 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited implied contract rights in corporate charters and affirmed states’ power to promote the public interest over private monopolies.
  • C. Gibbons v. Ogden
    Gibbons v. Ogden was an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed federal power over interstate commerce, significantly strengthening national authority relative to the states.
  • D. Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
    Martin v. Hunter's Lessee is an 1816 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the Court's authority to review state court decisions on federal law, reinforcing federal judicial supremacy.
  • E. Downes v. Bidwell
    Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d99d00b75c8190af98784c7df904c8 completed April 11, 2026, 12:59 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f71f39f298819088d79cda3ac2b375 completed May 3, 2026, 10:11 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:31 p.m.