Triple
T13335856
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Iron County |
E317689
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Millard County |
E35776
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Millard County | Statement: [Iron County, borders, Millard County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Millard County Context triple: [Iron County, borders, Millard County]
-
A.
Millard County
chosen
Millard County is a largely rural county in central Utah known for its agricultural communities, desert landscapes, and historical sites including portions of the old Mormon pioneer trails.
-
B.
Carson County
Carson County is a rural county in the Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and small-town communities.
-
C.
Mineral County
Mineral County is a rural county in western Nevada known for its mining history, desert landscapes, and the Hawthorne Army Depot.
-
D.
Mineral County
Mineral County is a sparsely populated, heavily forested county in western Montana known for its mountainous terrain, outdoor recreation, and proximity to the Idaho border.
-
E.
Curry County
Curry County is a coastal county in southwestern Oregon known for its rugged Pacific shoreline, forests, and small communities such as Port Orford.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b5a3c08190b42c267fb092f98a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99d00b75c8190af98784c7df904c8 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f73979cb4081909e750e2d98869891 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:30 p.m.