Triple
T13308726
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Attorney for the District of South Dakota |
E317004
|
entity |
| Predicate | handlesAppealsIn |
P109450
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit |
E14512
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit | Statement: [United States Attorney for the District of South Dakota, handlesAppealsIn, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Context triple: [United States Attorney for the District of South Dakota, handlesAppealsIn, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit]
-
A.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
chosen
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in several Midwestern states, including Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota.
-
B.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin.
-
C.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in six western and central states, including Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming.
-
D.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee.
-
E.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is a federal appellate court that reviews cases from district courts in a large western region of the United States, including states such as California, Arizona, and Washington.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: handlesAppealsIn Context triple: [United States Attorney for the District of South Dakota, handlesAppealsIn, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit]
-
A.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
B.
hearsAppealTo
Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
-
C.
hearsAppealsBy
Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
-
D.
appealsFor
Indicates that one entity formally requests support, intervention, or a favorable decision from another entity.
-
E.
hearsAppealsIn
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b40ab4819094adf6c374f4811a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d99cfdc9388190af1fdd3cd4717bd8 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f73061e90c81909badb0cd12b304a2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98f6893708190aeebf4c47386cff7 |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d99cf7f9c48190a6a4f452b4a2aefa |
completed | April 11, 2026, 12:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:29 p.m.