Triple
T13299460
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lao–Phuthai languages |
E316768
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Southwestern Tai languages subgroup |
C32793
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Southwestern Tai languages subgroup Context triple: [Lao–Phuthai languages, instanceOf, Southwestern Tai languages subgroup]
-
A.
Munda languages subgroup
The Munda languages subgroup is a branch of the Austroasiatic language family spoken primarily in eastern and central India, characterized by agglutinative morphology and distinctive phonological and syntactic features.
-
B.
Penutian languages subgroup
The Penutian languages subgroup is a proposed family of Native American languages, primarily spoken in western North America, that are hypothesized to share a common ancestral origin based on structural and lexical similarities.
-
C.
Hmong-Mien language
A Hmong-Mien language is a member of a small family of tonal languages spoken primarily in southern China and Southeast Asia, characterized by complex phonology and rich systems of classifiers.
-
D.
Hmong-Mien language
A Hmong-Mien language is a member of a small family of tonal languages spoken primarily in southern China and Southeast Asia, characterized by complex phonology and rich systems of lexical tone.
-
E.
Southern Maa language
Southern Maa language is a Nilotic language spoken primarily by the Maasai people of southern Kenya and northern Tanzania, characterized by its rich system of noun classes, tonal distinctions, and oral poetic traditions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b40ab4819094adf6c374f4811a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:28 p.m.