Triple
T13239856
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California Evidence Code |
E315250
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSection |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Evidence Code § 1220
Evidence Code § 1220 is a California statute that codifies the hearsay exception for admissions by a party opponent, allowing a party’s own statements to be used as evidence against them in court.
|
E1030145
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Evidence Code § 1220 | Statement: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1220]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Evidence Code § 1220 Context triple: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1220]
-
A.
Evidence Code § 210
Evidence Code § 210 is a provision of California law that defines what constitutes "relevant evidence" for purposes of admissibility in court proceedings.
-
B.
Evidence Code § 1271
Evidence Code § 1271 is a California statute that sets out the business records exception to the hearsay rule, allowing certain records made in the regular course of business to be admitted as evidence in court.
-
C.
Evidence Code § 1291
Evidence Code § 1291 is a California statute that sets out when former testimony may be admitted as an exception to the hearsay rule, particularly when the declarant is unavailable and the opposing party had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
-
D.
Evidence Code § 801
Evidence Code § 801 is a provision of the California Evidence Code that governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying when and how experts may base and present their opinions in court.
-
E.
Evidence Code § 702
Evidence Code § 702 is a California statute that governs the requirement that a witness have personal knowledge of the matter about which they testify before their testimony is admitted into evidence.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Evidence Code § 1220 Triple: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1220]
Generated description
Evidence Code § 1220 is a California statute that codifies the hearsay exception for admissions by a party opponent, allowing a party’s own statements to be used as evidence against them in court.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Evidence Code § 1220 Target entity description: Evidence Code § 1220 is a California statute that codifies the hearsay exception for admissions by a party opponent, allowing a party’s own statements to be used as evidence against them in court.
-
A.
Evidence Code § 210
Evidence Code § 210 is a provision of California law that defines what constitutes "relevant evidence" for purposes of admissibility in court proceedings.
-
B.
Evidence Code § 1271
Evidence Code § 1271 is a California statute that sets out the business records exception to the hearsay rule, allowing certain records made in the regular course of business to be admitted as evidence in court.
-
C.
Evidence Code § 1291
Evidence Code § 1291 is a California statute that sets out when former testimony may be admitted as an exception to the hearsay rule, particularly when the declarant is unavailable and the opposing party had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
-
D.
Evidence Code § 801
Evidence Code § 801 is a provision of the California Evidence Code that governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying when and how experts may base and present their opinions in court.
-
E.
Evidence Code § 702
Evidence Code § 702 is a California statute that governs the requirement that a witness have personal knowledge of the matter about which they testify before their testimony is admitted into evidence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806b1072881909e46bd212259c5f0 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98d5850ac8190849a51da39efe5be |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f70a38d09881909e8e3c32e9b1746e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:41 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69f70b117c588190bb81ff53664cac4a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:45 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69f70c04da34819091e01db25741674e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:23 p.m.