Triple

T13239854
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California Evidence Code E315250 entity
Predicate hasSection P35 FINISHED
Object Evidence Code § 1150 E315250 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Evidence Code § 1150 | Statement: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1150]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Evidence Code § 1150
Context triple: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1150]
  • A. Code of Evidence
    The Code of Evidence is a comprehensive set of rules governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Connecticut courts.
  • B. California Evidence Code chosen
    The California Evidence Code is a comprehensive statutory framework that governs the admissibility and use of evidence in California courts.
  • C. Oregon Evidence Code
    The Oregon Evidence Code is the body of rules that governs what evidence is admissible and how it may be used in legal proceedings in Oregon’s courts.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
  • E. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
    Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b1072881909e46bd212259c5f0 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98d5850ac8190849a51da39efe5be completed April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6ff323a3c8190b46b24e69e653105 completed May 3, 2026, 7:54 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:23 p.m.