Triple

T13239853
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California Evidence Code E315250 entity
Predicate hasSection P35 FINISHED
Object Evidence Code § 1101
Evidence Code § 1101 is a key California evidence rule that generally prohibits using a person’s character or prior bad acts to prove conduct on a specific occasion, while allowing such evidence for limited purposes like proving motive, intent, or identity.
E1030144 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Evidence Code § 1101 | Statement: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1101]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Evidence Code § 1101
Context triple: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1101]
  • A. Evidence Code § 801
    Evidence Code § 801 is a provision of the California Evidence Code that governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying when and how experts may base and present their opinions in court.
  • B. Evidence Code § 210
    Evidence Code § 210 is a provision of California law that defines what constitutes "relevant evidence" for purposes of admissibility in court proceedings.
  • C. Evidence Code § 1271
    Evidence Code § 1271 is a California statute that sets out the business records exception to the hearsay rule, allowing certain records made in the regular course of business to be admitted as evidence in court.
  • D. Evidence Code § 1291
    Evidence Code § 1291 is a California statute that sets out when former testimony may be admitted as an exception to the hearsay rule, particularly when the declarant is unavailable and the opposing party had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
  • E. Code of Evidence
    The Code of Evidence is a comprehensive set of rules governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Connecticut courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Evidence Code § 1101
Triple: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 1101]
Generated description
Evidence Code § 1101 is a key California evidence rule that generally prohibits using a person’s character or prior bad acts to prove conduct on a specific occasion, while allowing such evidence for limited purposes like proving motive, intent, or identity.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Evidence Code § 1101
Target entity description: Evidence Code § 1101 is a key California evidence rule that generally prohibits using a person’s character or prior bad acts to prove conduct on a specific occasion, while allowing such evidence for limited purposes like proving motive, intent, or identity.
  • A. Evidence Code § 801
    Evidence Code § 801 is a provision of the California Evidence Code that governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying when and how experts may base and present their opinions in court.
  • B. Evidence Code § 210
    Evidence Code § 210 is a provision of California law that defines what constitutes "relevant evidence" for purposes of admissibility in court proceedings.
  • C. Evidence Code § 1271
    Evidence Code § 1271 is a California statute that sets out the business records exception to the hearsay rule, allowing certain records made in the regular course of business to be admitted as evidence in court.
  • D. Evidence Code § 1291
    Evidence Code § 1291 is a California statute that sets out when former testimony may be admitted as an exception to the hearsay rule, particularly when the declarant is unavailable and the opposing party had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
  • E. Code of Evidence
    The Code of Evidence is a comprehensive set of rules governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Connecticut courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b1072881909e46bd212259c5f0 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98d5850ac8190849a51da39efe5be completed April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f70a38d09881909e8e3c32e9b1746e completed May 3, 2026, 8:41 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69f70b117c588190bb81ff53664cac4a completed May 3, 2026, 8:45 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69f70c04da34819091e01db25741674e completed May 3, 2026, 8:49 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:23 p.m.