Triple

T13239851
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California Evidence Code E315250 entity
Predicate hasSection P35 FINISHED
Object Evidence Code § 801
Evidence Code § 801 is a provision of the California Evidence Code that governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying when and how experts may base and present their opinions in court.
E1028509 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Evidence Code § 801 | Statement: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 801]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Evidence Code § 801
Context triple: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 801]
  • A. Code of Evidence
    The Code of Evidence is a comprehensive set of rules governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Connecticut courts.
  • B. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
    Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1008
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1008 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allocates to the jury (or factfinder) the responsibility for deciding certain preliminary factual questions about the authenticity and contents of writings, recordings, and photographs when those issues are in dispute.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
  • E. Georgia Evidence Code
    The Georgia Evidence Code is the body of state law that governs what evidence is admissible and how it must be presented in Georgia courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Evidence Code § 801
Triple: [California Evidence Code, hasSection, Evidence Code § 801]
Generated description
Evidence Code § 801 is a provision of the California Evidence Code that governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying when and how experts may base and present their opinions in court.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Evidence Code § 801
Target entity description: Evidence Code § 801 is a provision of the California Evidence Code that governs the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, specifying when and how experts may base and present their opinions in court.
  • A. Code of Evidence
    The Code of Evidence is a comprehensive set of rules governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Connecticut courts.
  • B. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
    Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
  • C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1008
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1008 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allocates to the jury (or factfinder) the responsibility for deciding certain preliminary factual questions about the authenticity and contents of writings, recordings, and photographs when those issues are in dispute.
  • D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
    Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
  • E. Georgia Evidence Code
    The Georgia Evidence Code is the body of state law that governs what evidence is admissible and how it must be presented in Georgia courts.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806b1072881909e46bd212259c5f0 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98d5850ac8190849a51da39efe5be completed April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6ff323a3c8190b46b24e69e653105 completed May 3, 2026, 7:54 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69f7013b3428819083c2bb6032aa08d4 completed May 3, 2026, 8:03 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69f702b40f088190bc3c24321309dfb1 completed May 3, 2026, 8:09 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:23 p.m.