Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence | Statement: [California Evidence Code, influencedBy, Federal Rules of Evidence]

Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence
Context triple: [California Evidence Code, influencedBy, Federal Rules of Evidence]

• A. rules of evidence for the federal courts chosen
  The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
• B. Washington Rules of Evidence
  The Washington Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Washington State courts.
• C. Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
• D. Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
  Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
• E. Federal Rule of Evidence 807
  Federal Rule of Evidence 807 is the “residual” hearsay exception that allows admission of certain trustworthy hearsay statements not covered by other specific exceptions when doing so serves the interests of justice.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.