Triple
T13233763
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Peter Huber |
E315088
|
entity |
| Predicate | isNameSharedBy |
P20785
|
FINISHED |
| Object | multipleIndividuals |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: multipleIndividuals | Statement: [Peter Huber, isNameSharedBy, multipleIndividuals]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isNameSharedBy Context triple: [Peter Huber, isNameSharedBy, multipleIndividuals]
-
A.
isSharedBy
Indicates that something is jointly possessed, used, or experienced by two or more entities.
-
B.
sharesGivenNameWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities have the same given (first) name.
-
C.
provinceSharesNameWith
Indicates that two provinces have exactly the same name, even if they are distinct administrative entities.
-
D.
hasLastNameInCommonWith
Indicates that two entities share the same last name.
-
E.
isRelatedName
Indicates that one name is connected to another through a variant, derivative, or otherwise non-identical but related naming relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806affc688190a25b6ccc588e9c72 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98d36bdf8819099949b1e0e6902d3 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98bcb21648190aef241de1e7887e2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:22 p.m.