Triple
T13226284
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spanish Patent and Trademark Office |
E314887
|
entity |
| Predicate | treatyRole |
P60943
|
FINISHED |
| Object | International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty |
E80300
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty | Statement: [Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, treatyRole, International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty Context triple: [Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, treatyRole, International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty]
-
A.
International Searching Authority
chosen
The International Searching Authority is a national or regional patent office designated to conduct prior art searches and issue international search reports for patent applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
-
B.
International Preliminary Examining Authority
The International Preliminary Examining Authority is a designated patent office or organization that conducts optional, in-depth examinations of international patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty to assess their potential patentability before national phase entry.
-
C.
Patent Cooperation Treaty
The Patent Cooperation Treaty is an international agreement that streamlines the process for seeking patent protection in multiple countries through a single unified application system.
-
D.
Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification
The Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification is an international treaty that established a standardized system for classifying patents and utility models to facilitate the retrieval and comparison of technical information worldwide.
-
E.
European Patent Office
The European Patent Office is a regional patent authority that examines and grants European patents for member states of the European Patent Organisation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treatyRole Context triple: [Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, treatyRole, International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty]
-
A.
roleInTreaties
chosen
Indicates the specific capacity, function, or position an entity holds within the context of one or more treaties.
-
B.
treatyType
Indicates the specific category or classification of a treaty that characterizes the nature of the agreement between parties.
-
C.
partnerInTreaty
Indicates that an entity is a formal participant or signatory in a specific treaty or international agreement.
-
D.
treaty
Indicates a formal, negotiated agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, that defines mutual obligations, rights, or terms of cooperation.
-
E.
treatyOf
Indicates a formal agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, defining their mutual obligations or terms.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806affc688190a25b6ccc588e9c72 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98d3128348190836158467e9cfbe2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6ff28612c81909d4fe93b0e571deb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98bcb21648190aef241de1e7887e2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:19 p.m.