Triple

T13226284
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Spanish Patent and Trademark Office E314887 entity
Predicate treatyRole P60943 FINISHED
Object International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty E80300 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty | Statement: [Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, treatyRole, International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty
Context triple: [Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, treatyRole, International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty]
  • A. International Searching Authority chosen
    The International Searching Authority is a national or regional patent office designated to conduct prior art searches and issue international search reports for patent applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
  • B. International Preliminary Examining Authority
    The International Preliminary Examining Authority is a designated patent office or organization that conducts optional, in-depth examinations of international patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty to assess their potential patentability before national phase entry.
  • C. Patent Cooperation Treaty
    The Patent Cooperation Treaty is an international agreement that streamlines the process for seeking patent protection in multiple countries through a single unified application system.
  • D. Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification
    The Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification is an international treaty that established a standardized system for classifying patents and utility models to facilitate the retrieval and comparison of technical information worldwide.
  • E. European Patent Office
    The European Patent Office is a regional patent authority that examines and grants European patents for member states of the European Patent Organisation.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: treatyRole
Context triple: [Spanish Patent and Trademark Office, treatyRole, International Searching Authority under the Patent Cooperation Treaty]
  • A. roleInTreaties chosen
    Indicates the specific capacity, function, or position an entity holds within the context of one or more treaties.
  • B. treatyType
    Indicates the specific category or classification of a treaty that characterizes the nature of the agreement between parties.
  • C. partnerInTreaty
    Indicates that an entity is a formal participant or signatory in a specific treaty or international agreement.
  • D. treaty
    Indicates a formal, negotiated agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, that defines mutual obligations, rights, or terms of cooperation.
  • E. treatyOf
    Indicates a formal agreement or pact established between entities, typically states or organizations, defining their mutual obligations or terms.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806affc688190a25b6ccc588e9c72 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98d3128348190836158467e9cfbe2 completed April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6ff28612c81909d4fe93b0e571deb completed May 3, 2026, 7:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98bcb21648190aef241de1e7887e2 completed April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:19 p.m.