Triple

T13225625
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject National Energy Policy report E314872 entity
Predicate legalProceeding P3010 FINISHED
Object Sierra Club v. Cheney E16775 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sierra Club v. Cheney | Statement: [National Energy Policy report, legalProceeding, Sierra Club v. Cheney]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sierra Club v. Cheney
Context triple: [National Energy Policy report, legalProceeding, Sierra Club v. Cheney]
  • A. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
    Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act and relevant statutes.
  • B. Kivalina v. ExxonMobil
    Kivalina v. ExxonMobil is a landmark U.S. climate change lawsuit in which an Alaskan village sued major energy companies for damages allegedly caused by global warming and resulting coastal erosion.
  • C. Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia chosen
    Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
  • D. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • E. North Carolina v. EPA
    North Carolina v. EPA is a 2008 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals case that significantly limited the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to implement interstate air pollution controls under the Clean Air Act, leading to the invalidation of the Clean Air Interstate Rule.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806affc688190a25b6ccc588e9c72 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98d3128348190836158467e9cfbe2 completed April 10, 2026, 11:52 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6ff28612c81909d4fe93b0e571deb completed May 3, 2026, 7:54 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:19 p.m.