Triple

T13220379
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fiasco E314735 entity
Predicate literaryAnalysisFocus P36841 FINISHED
Object representation of totalitarian systems LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: representation of totalitarian systems | Statement: [Fiasco, literaryAnalysisFocus, representation of totalitarian systems]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: literaryAnalysisFocus
Context triple: [Fiasco, literaryAnalysisFocus, representation of totalitarian systems]
  • A. literaryFeature
    Indicates a relationship where something possesses or exhibits a characteristic, device, or stylistic element used in literature.
  • B. literarySubject chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the subject, topic, or focus of a literary work created by another entity.
  • C. literaryPurpose
    Indicates the intended function, effect, or communicative goal that a text or passage is meant to achieve within a literary context.
  • D. literaryCriticismType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of literary criticism applied to a work, author, or text.
  • E. literaryInterest
    Indicates that one entity has an interest in, appreciation of, or engagement with the literary works or writings of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806affc688190a25b6ccc588e9c72 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98cf581508190883033f0c961736a completed April 10, 2026, 11:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98bc938f081909f123bdf1263ff7f completed April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:18 p.m.