Triple

T13219052
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sena–Nyanja languages E314699 entity
Predicate hasMemberLanguage P7390 FINISHED
Object Korekore dialect cluster E634464 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Korekore dialect cluster | Statement: [Sena–Nyanja languages, hasMemberLanguage, Korekore dialect cluster]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Korekore dialect cluster
Context triple: [Sena–Nyanja languages, hasMemberLanguage, Korekore dialect cluster]
  • A. Korekore dialect chosen
    The Korekore dialect is a regional variety of the Shona language spoken primarily by the Korekore people in northern Zimbabwe.
  • B. Kikai dialect
    The Kikai dialect is a regional variety of the Amami language spoken on Kikai Island in Japan’s Ryukyu archipelago.
  • C. Paku dialect
    The Paku dialect is a regional variety of the Maanyan language spoken by Dayak communities in parts of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.
  • D. Kuto-Kute dialect
    The Kuto-Kute dialect is a regional variety of the Sasak language spoken on the island of Lombok in Indonesia.
  • E. Kamia dialect
    The Kamia dialect is a regional variety of the Ipai-Tipai language traditionally spoken by the Kamia (Kumeyaay) people of southern California and northern Baja California.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806affc688190a25b6ccc588e9c72 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98cf392e08190949ee4d194566395 completed April 10, 2026, 11:51 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f6ff2085f88190be8cfc309d21f9cb completed May 3, 2026, 7:54 a.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:18 p.m.