Triple
T13213440
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alvin |
E314548
|
entity |
| Predicate | underwentMajorUpgrade |
P31455
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2010s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2010s | Statement: [Alvin, underwentMajorUpgrade, 2010s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: underwentMajorUpgrade Context triple: [Alvin, underwentMajorUpgrade, 2010s]
-
A.
isMajorUpgrade
Indicates that one version or change represents a significant, non-trivial upgrade over another in terms of scope, impact, or functionality.
-
B.
underwentUpgrade
Indicates that an entity has experienced an improvement or enhancement process that changed it to a newer or more advanced state.
-
C.
hasMajorInstallation
Indicates that one entity possesses, hosts, or contains a primary or significant facility, base, or installation of another entity.
-
D.
plannedUpgrade
Indicates that an entity has a scheduled or intended improvement or enhancement to be carried out in the future.
-
E.
majorUpdate
chosen
Indicates that a substantial or significant change or revision has been made to something, typically altering its core features or functionality.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806aee7308190b70a237ba2a6e3e1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98c9f0f148190a0698ef27573c885 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98bc938f081909f123bdf1263ff7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:17 p.m.