Triple
T1320948
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brandon Roy |
E28215
|
entity |
| Predicate | attemptedComebackSeason |
P26503
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2012-2013 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2012-2013 | Statement: [Brandon Roy, attemptedComebackSeason, 2012-2013]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: attemptedComebackSeason Context triple: [Brandon Roy, attemptedComebackSeason, 2012-2013]
-
A.
teamInComeback
Indicates that a team participates in or is responsible for a comeback, overturning a losing or disadvantaged position.
-
B.
opponentInComeback
Indicates that an entity serves as the opposing side or competitor in a situation characterized as a comeback (e.g., recovering from a disadvantage).
-
C.
competitionSeason
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular competitive season or edition of a competition.
-
D.
decidingGameComebackWin
Indicates that a team or player secured a win in the final, decisive game of a series by overcoming a deficit and mounting a comeback.
-
E.
hasPostseasonImpact
Indicates that an event, action, or outcome has a direct effect on postseason qualification, seeding, or performance.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a498540a2481909e807a762280d3ba |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c19932888190a3d45871e84f112e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4beedb49c8190beb5b85cdda05013 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4bf8158ac8190b8360ecccc2980bc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:36 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:55 p.m.