Triple
T13200254
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Basic English |
E314221
|
entity |
| Predicate | totalRecommendedVocabularySize |
P18536
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1100 words |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1100 words | Statement: [Basic English, totalRecommendedVocabularySize, 1100 words]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: totalRecommendedVocabularySize Context triple: [Basic English, totalRecommendedVocabularySize, 1100 words]
-
A.
hasLimitedVocabulary
Indicates that an entity possesses or uses only a small or restricted set of words or terms in communication or expression.
-
B.
hasKnownVocabulary
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a defined, identifiable set of terms or words that it can recognize or use.
-
C.
estimatedNumberOfLanguages
Indicates the approximate count of distinct languages associated with an entity, typically based on estimation rather than an exact measurement.
-
D.
languageFamilySize
Indicates the number of languages that belong to a particular language family.
-
E.
hasUncertainVocabulary
Indicates that the relationship involves vocabulary whose meaning, usage, or interpretation is not clearly defined or is subject to doubt.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806aee7308190b70a237ba2a6e3e1 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98cf054f88190b05ced98d5a22a62 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98bc6bc108190b5a6a265bf6e9fd4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:16 p.m.