Triple
T13171863
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Itanda Falls |
E312994
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageOfToponym |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lusoga |
E275006
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lusoga | Statement: [Itanda Falls, languageOfToponym, Lusoga]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lusoga Context triple: [Itanda Falls, languageOfToponym, Lusoga]
-
A.
Lusoga
chosen
Lusoga is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Basoga people in eastern Uganda.
-
B.
Kalambo
Kalambo is an agricultural research station site in the Lake Tanganyika region of Tanzania, known for supporting tropical crop and farming systems research.
-
C.
Lugazi
Lugazi is a town in central Uganda known for its sugar plantations and location along the Kampala–Jinja highway.
-
D.
Nungua
Nungua is a coastal town and suburb of Accra in southern Ghana, known for its fishing community and vibrant local culture.
-
E.
Oshikwambi
Oshikwambi is a regional dialect of the Oshiwambo language spoken by the Kwambi people in northern Namibia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806ac3ee081909b2fd27d060aa974 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d98c2f22b881908a0af3af0a0af971 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6eafb81288190a6dcc3bd872998d8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:13 p.m.