Triple

T13157670
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Exeter, Devon, England E312631 entity
Predicate historicalCountyTownSince P13121 FINISHED
Object 13th century LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 13th century | Statement: [Exeter, Devon, England, historicalCountyTownSince, 13th century]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalCountyTownSince
Context triple: [Exeter, Devon, England, historicalCountyTownSince, 13th century]
  • A. hasHistoricCountySeat chosen
    Indicates that an administrative region historically had its county government or main county offices located in a particular settlement or city.
  • B. historicalCounty
    Indicates that an entity was located within or associated with a county as it existed in the past, even if that county’s boundaries or administrative status have since changed.
  • C. hasHistoricCountyStatusSince
    Indicates that an entity has held the legal or recognized status of a historic county starting from a specified point in time.
  • D. historicalTownshipOf
    Indicates that one entity was formerly a township encompassing or governing the other entity during a past historical period.
  • E. historicalCountyChange
    Indicates that a county’s administrative boundaries or status have been altered over time, such as through creation, dissolution, merger, or territorial reassignment.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806aabde48190899e13e41659cae5 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98cf054f88190b05ced98d5a22a62 completed April 10, 2026, 11:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98bbd1d088190b7c69f37fc6eeb64 completed April 10, 2026, 11:46 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:12 p.m.