Triple
T13136168
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Meteor F.1 |
E312089
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gloster Meteor variant |
C32526
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Gloster Meteor variant Context triple: [Meteor F.1, instanceOf, Gloster Meteor variant]
-
A.
Hawker Tempest variant
A Hawker Tempest variant is a specific model or sub-type of the British Hawker Tempest fighter aircraft distinguished by particular design features, performance characteristics, or operational roles.
-
B.
Boulton Paul Defiant variant
A Boulton Paul Defiant variant is any modified version of the British WWII turret-armed fighter aircraft, differing from the base model in aspects such as armament, role, equipment, or structural configuration.
-
C.
Vickers Wellington variant
A Vickers Wellington variant is a specific model or modification of the British twin‑engine Wellington bomber, distinguished by changes in equipment, structure, or role to meet particular operational requirements.
-
D.
Supermarine Swift variant
A Supermarine Swift variant is a specific model within the Supermarine Swift family of British jet fighter and reconnaissance aircraft, distinguished by particular modifications in design, equipment, or role.
-
E.
de Havilland Mosquito variant
A de Havilland Mosquito variant is a specific model of the twin‑engine, multi‑role World War II aircraft distinguished by particular modifications to its structure, equipment, or mission profile (such as fighter, bomber, reconnaissance, or night fighter roles).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a9fe888190b081e2d9ea665d6c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:08 p.m.