Triple

T13134197
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Technical Group of Independents E312038 entity
Predicate internalCohesion P108353 FINISHED
Object low LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: low | Statement: [Technical Group of Independents, internalCohesion, low]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: internalCohesion
Context triple: [Technical Group of Independents, internalCohesion, low]
  • A. internalStructure
    Indicates that one entity is a component, part, or substructure contained within the overall structure of another entity.
  • B. internalOutcome
    Indicates an outcome or result that arises from within an entity, system, or process itself, rather than from external factors.
  • C. companyInternal
    Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within the same company or is restricted to internal company context.
  • D. internalConflict
    Indicates a relationship where an entity experiences opposing desires, beliefs, or motives within itself, leading to psychological or emotional tension.
  • E. usedInternally
    Indicates that something is utilized within an organization, system, or component itself rather than being exposed or provided for external use.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806a9fe888190b081e2d9ea665d6c completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d981b3d72c8190b69ae56435a954fa completed April 10, 2026, 11:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9804543cc8190a23cd7da59a12a7b completed April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d980e622e8819087a69bfb1660dd64 completed April 10, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:08 p.m.