Triple
T13133717
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Costa v ENEL |
E312027
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. |
E312027
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. | Statement: [Costa v ENEL, fullCaseName, Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L. Context triple: [Costa v ENEL, fullCaseName, Flaminio Costa v E.N.E.L.]
-
A.
Costa v ENEL
chosen
Costa v ENEL is a landmark 1964 judgment of the European Court of Justice that established the primacy of European Union law over conflicting national law.
-
B.
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
C.
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd is a landmark UK constitutional law case in which the House of Lords affirmed the supremacy of European Community law over conflicting domestic legislation and allowed for the suspension of an Act of Parliament.
-
D.
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the validity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the Rules Enabling Act and helped define the scope of federal procedural rulemaking.
-
E.
United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.
United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co. is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly broadened the federal government’s authority to regulate non-navigable waterways under the Commerce Clause.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a9fe888190b081e2d9ea665d6c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d981b3d72c8190b69ae56435a954fa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:03 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f6e2930c6c8190adf17103a6cb71b9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:08 p.m.