Triple
T13126992
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dolby B |
E311868
|
entity |
| Predicate | relativePerformance |
P25304
|
FINISHED |
| Object | provides less noise reduction than Dolby C |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: provides less noise reduction than Dolby C | Statement: [Dolby B, relativePerformance, provides less noise reduction than Dolby C]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativePerformance Context triple: [Dolby B, relativePerformance, provides less noise reduction than Dolby C]
-
A.
relativeSuccess
Indicates a comparison of how successful one entity is relative to another or to a defined benchmark.
-
B.
performanceBasis
Indicates that one entity’s performance is evaluated, determined, or justified on the basis of another specified factor, standard, or reference.
-
C.
performanceRelativeToMarket
Indicates how an entity’s performance compares to a relevant market benchmark over a given period.
-
D.
relativeLevel
chosen
Indicates a comparative relationship specifying how one entity’s level, degree, or intensity of some property stands relative to that of another entity.
-
E.
performanceReputation
Indicates the perceived quality or reliability of an entity’s past or expected performance as judged by others.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a9fe888190b081e2d9ea665d6c |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9819aac388190b59bf43cc6a49d0c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d98043a74c81908648e6cd0b4c7f71 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:07 p.m.