Triple

T13123626
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Saskatchewan Act, 1905 E311785 entity
Predicate constitutionalInterpretation P2720 FINISHED
Object interpreted in light of Canadian federalism principles LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: interpreted in light of Canadian federalism principles | Statement: [Saskatchewan Act, 1905, constitutionalInterpretation, interpreted in light of Canadian federalism principles]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalInterpretation
Context triple: [Saskatchewan Act, 1905, constitutionalInterpretation, interpreted in light of Canadian federalism principles]
  • A. constitutionalInterpretationBody
    Indicates that an entity serves as an official body responsible for interpreting a constitution or constitutional provisions in a legal or authoritative capacity.
  • B. constitutionalEffect
    Indicates the impact or consequence that something has on a constitution or constitutional order.
  • C. constitutionalProvisionInterpreted
    Indicates that a specific constitutional provision has been interpreted or given meaning by a judicial or authoritative body in relation to a particular context or case.
  • D. constitutionalContext chosen
    Indicates that something occurs, is interpreted, or is evaluated within the framework, principles, or provisions of a constitution.
  • E. constitutionalImplication
    Indicates that one constitutional provision, principle, or rule logically entails, influences, or gives rise to another within a legal or governmental framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806a9fe888190b081e2d9ea665d6c completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9819840b881909b76022b4c4dcaed completed April 10, 2026, 11:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98043a74c81908648e6cd0b4c7f71 completed April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:07 p.m.