Triple

T13106169
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject OCSE (FAS) E310847 entity
Predicate supportsMissionArea P108087 FINISHED
Object federal acquisition LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: federal acquisition | Statement: [OCSE (FAS), supportsMissionArea, federal acquisition]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsMissionArea
Context triple: [OCSE (FAS), supportsMissionArea, federal acquisition]
  • A. supportsMissionType
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, enabling, or being compatible with a specified type of mission.
  • B. supportsPolicyArea
    Indicates that one entity endorses, advocates for, or is in favor of a particular policy area or domain of public policy.
  • C. supportsTechnologyArea
    Indicates that one entity provides backing, resources, or endorsement for a particular technology area associated with another entity.
  • D. supportsMissionPhase
    Indicates that one entity provides the necessary capabilities, resources, or conditions for another entity to function or be valid during a specific mission phase.
  • E. supportArea
    Indicates that one entity serves as a supporting region or surface that provides structural or functional backing for another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d806a872d08190a329806f8ff30df4 completed April 9, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d98154c9f48190aeca779d97151759 completed April 10, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d98041a3548190a05ddd83dbb660fa completed April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d98134df64819084a5674f9475dcc2 completed April 10, 2026, 11:01 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:05 p.m.