Triple
T13087293
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Florida Derby |
E310369
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTeamColorContrast |
P107982
|
FINISHED |
| Object | purple vs pink |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: purple vs pink | Statement: [Florida Derby, hasTeamColorContrast, purple vs pink]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTeamColorContrast Context triple: [Florida Derby, hasTeamColorContrast, purple vs pink]
-
A.
teamColorContext
Indicates the contextual or situational association between a team and its designated color.
-
B.
teamColor
Indicates the association between a team and the color that represents or identifies it.
-
C.
introducedTeamColor
Indicates that an entity is responsible for introducing or establishing a particular team color for a team or group.
-
D.
hasClubColor
Indicates that a club or team is associated with a specific color or set of colors used to represent it.
-
E.
hasEmblemColor
Indicates that an emblem possesses or is characterized by a specific color.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d806a733548190989cfd4ce981ca33 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:05 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d981378dd08190b4f00e4e5df0e480 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9803f6c508190bfadfbc2d00c2c64 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d98114a6508190b1e8e018bb5a068c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9:02 p.m.