Triple
T13069845
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | G22 |
E329426
|
entity |
| Predicate | designUpdate |
P3336
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distinctive front-end styling compared to predecessor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distinctive front-end styling compared to predecessor | Statement: [G22, designUpdate, distinctive front-end styling compared to predecessor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designUpdate Context triple: [G22, designUpdate, distinctive front-end styling compared to predecessor]
-
A.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
-
B.
designVariant
Indicates that one entity is an alternative design or version derived from or related to another entity’s design.
-
C.
hasDesignChange
Indicates that an entity has undergone a modification or alteration to its original design.
-
D.
designLead
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary designer or person in charge of leading the design work for another entity or project.
-
E.
redesigned
chosen
Indicates that an entity has been modified or created anew in terms of its structure, appearance, or functionality, replacing a previous design.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80771749c81909a6d9197b9504872 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d980ee6130819095d835e7ff6a8c5b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9803d46688190bac6b7d208f08d01 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 9 p.m.