Triple
T13062376
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yankton County, South Dakota |
E329229
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Utica, South Dakota
Utica, South Dakota is a small rural town located in Yankton County in the southeastern part of the state.
|
E1099743
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Utica, South Dakota | Statement: [Yankton County, South Dakota, hasTown, Utica, South Dakota]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Utica, South Dakota Context triple: [Yankton County, South Dakota, hasTown, Utica, South Dakota]
-
A.
Hartford, South Dakota
Hartford, South Dakota is a small city in eastern South Dakota that serves as a growing residential community near Sioux Falls.
-
B.
Humboldt, South Dakota
Humboldt, South Dakota is a small rural town in eastern South Dakota located just west of Sioux Falls.
-
C.
Frankfort, South Dakota
Frankfort, South Dakota is a small rural town located in eastern South Dakota within the agricultural region of the state.
-
D.
Northville, South Dakota
Northville, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northeastern South Dakota within the agricultural region of Spink County.
-
E.
Harrisburg, South Dakota
Harrisburg, South Dakota is a rapidly growing suburban city near Sioux Falls known for its family-friendly community and strong school system.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Utica, South Dakota Triple: [Yankton County, South Dakota, hasTown, Utica, South Dakota]
Generated description
Utica, South Dakota is a small rural town located in Yankton County in the southeastern part of the state.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Utica, South Dakota Target entity description: Utica, South Dakota is a small rural town located in Yankton County in the southeastern part of the state.
-
A.
Hartford, South Dakota
Hartford, South Dakota is a small city in eastern South Dakota that serves as a growing residential community near Sioux Falls.
-
B.
Humboldt, South Dakota
Humboldt, South Dakota is a small rural town in eastern South Dakota located just west of Sioux Falls.
-
C.
Frankfort, South Dakota
Frankfort, South Dakota is a small rural town located in eastern South Dakota within the agricultural region of the state.
-
D.
Northville, South Dakota
Northville, South Dakota is a small rural town located in northeastern South Dakota within the agricultural region of Spink County.
-
E.
Harrisburg, South Dakota
Harrisburg, South Dakota is a rapidly growing suburban city near Sioux Falls known for its family-friendly community and strong school system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80771749c81909a6d9197b9504872 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d980e7ee548190b4b18bdb1357c359 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd5bad771881908280e3d96be068fc |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:42 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69fd5d6af9ac8190a37f11b0f8a1db0f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:50 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69fd5df48f7481909764bc4e23c0b04a |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:52 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:59 p.m.