Triple

T1305638
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RYAAY E27869 entity
Predicate hasUnderlyingISIN P5717 FINISHED
Object IE00BYTBXV33 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: IE00BYTBXV33 | Statement: [RYAAY, hasUnderlyingISIN, IE00BYTBXV33]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUnderlyingISIN
Context triple: [RYAAY, hasUnderlyingISIN, IE00BYTBXV33]
  • A. hasUnderlyingLEI
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or identified by, a specific underlying Legal Entity Identifier (LEI).
  • B. hasISIN chosen
    Indicates that a financial instrument is associated with a specific International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) that uniquely identifies it.
  • C. underlyingInstrument
    Indicates that one financial instrument serves as the reference or basis for the value, payoff, or structure of another financial instrument.
  • D. ISIN
    Indicates that an entity is identified or associated with a specific International Securities Identification Number (ISIN).
  • E. underlyingAsset
    Indicates that one asset serves as the fundamental reference or basis for the value, performance, or contractual terms of another financial instrument or derivative.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a496d7d83481908f83085854e51328 completed March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c13524d481909e8f5bb2ab91f6e4 completed March 1, 2026, 10:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bee8544c8190874efd9bae9bccf9 completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:51 p.m.