Triple
T13019772
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TTable |
E322642
|
entity |
| Predicate | lifecycleMethod |
P90879
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Open |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Open | Statement: [TTable, lifecycleMethod, Open]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lifecycleMethod Context triple: [TTable, lifecycleMethod, Open]
-
A.
lifecycleModel
Indicates that one entity defines or follows the structured sequence of phases or stages governing the development, use, and retirement of another entity.
-
B.
lifecycleOperation
chosen
Indicates an action that changes or manages the state of an entity as it moves through different stages of its lifecycle.
-
C.
lifecycleResponsibility
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing or overseeing the entire lifecycle of another entity, from creation through modification to retirement or disposal.
-
D.
designedForLifecycle
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to support, align with, or optimize a particular lifecycle or set of lifecycle stages.
-
E.
lifecycleTiedTo
Indicates that the existence, duration, or validity of one entity is dependent on and ends with the lifecycle of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d807657e8c8190bd9435ee2f823845 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97ecf21bc819082fb512bc479b4be |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97dc39a0881908119c62e31bf6182 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:51 p.m.