Triple
T13019019
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Camargue cowboys |
E322626
|
entity |
| Predicate | animalHandlingTechnique |
P107471
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mounted herding |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mounted herding | Statement: [Camargue cowboys, animalHandlingTechnique, mounted herding]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: animalHandlingTechnique Context triple: [Camargue cowboys, animalHandlingTechnique, mounted herding]
-
A.
canBeTamedWith
Indicates that an entity can be domesticated, controlled, or made docile through the use of a specified tool, method, or resource.
-
B.
usesAnimalCarcass
Indicates that an entity makes use of an animal’s dead body or its remains for some purpose.
-
C.
usesCaninesFor
Indicates a relationship where an entity employs or relies on its canine teeth for a particular function or activity.
-
D.
animalWelfarePractice
Indicates practices, actions, or policies that affect the well-being, treatment, and living conditions of animals.
-
E.
animalComponent
Indicates that one entity is a physical or functional part, piece, or constituent of an animal.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d807657e8c8190bd9435ee2f823845 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97ece22908190a0941e23df7c774d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97dc39a0881908119c62e31bf6182 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d97e3df2288190a7f27d31d248bb7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:51 p.m.