Triple
T12977468
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Watts River |
E321564
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProtectedCatchment |
P101269
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Watts River catchment area |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Watts River catchment area | Statement: [Watts River, hasProtectedCatchment, Watts River catchment area]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProtectedCatchment Context triple: [Watts River, hasProtectedCatchment, Watts River catchment area]
-
A.
hasProtectedWatershed
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a watershed area that is legally or formally protected for conservation or resource management purposes.
-
B.
hasProtectedArea
Indicates that an entity possesses, includes, or is associated with a designated protected area for conservation or restricted use.
-
C.
hasProtectedAreaStatus
Indicates that an area is officially designated and managed as a protected area under relevant conservation or legal frameworks.
-
D.
hasProtectedAreaCoverage
Indicates that a specified portion or extent of an area falls within officially designated protected areas.
-
E.
hasNeighbouringProtectedArea
Indicates that one protected area is directly adjacent to or shares a boundary with another protected area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80763bd6c819094437da5b20b01d2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97f2a71a0819098bb6cf8a4b2208a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97dbdd94c8190ac4bbecca02dc77b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:38 p.m.