Triple
T12971075
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Davis County |
E321395
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Woods Cross, Utah |
E285675
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Woods Cross, Utah | Statement: [Davis County, hasCity, Woods Cross, Utah]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Woods Cross, Utah Context triple: [Davis County, hasCity, Woods Cross, Utah]
-
A.
Woods Cross, Utah
chosen
Woods Cross, Utah is a small suburban city in Davis County that forms part of the greater Salt Lake City metropolitan area along the Wasatch Front.
-
B.
Kaysville, Utah
Kaysville, Utah is a suburban city in Davis County situated along the Wasatch Front between Salt Lake City and Ogden.
-
C.
Lindon, Utah
Lindon, Utah is a small suburban city in Utah County situated along the Wasatch Front between Orem and Pleasant Grove.
-
D.
North Salt Lake, Utah
North Salt Lake, Utah is a suburban city in Davis County that forms part of the greater Salt Lake City metropolitan area along the Wasatch Front.
-
E.
Cedar Hills, Utah
Cedar Hills, Utah is a small residential city at the base of the Wasatch Range in northern Utah known for its family-oriented community and proximity to outdoor recreation.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80763bd6c819094437da5b20b01d2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e418d548190be1c73db76cb3aa8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f7a82efbb0819081c4eff91303de31 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:55 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:35 p.m.