Triple
T12962458
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lanzón Gallery |
E321177
|
entity |
| Predicate | spatialCharacter |
P107718
|
FINISHED |
| Object | labyrinthine layout |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: labyrinthine layout | Statement: [Lanzón Gallery, spatialCharacter, labyrinthine layout]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: spatialCharacter Context triple: [Lanzón Gallery, spatialCharacter, labyrinthine layout]
-
A.
character3
Indicates a tertiary or additional character role associated with an entity, typically the third distinct character linked within a given context or work.
-
B.
regionCharacter
Indicates a characteristic, feature, or quality that typifies or defines a particular region.
-
C.
character2
Indicates that a second character entity is involved in the relationship or context defined by the predicate.
-
D.
zoningCharacter
Indicates how the regulatory or functional nature of a geographic area is defined or classified in terms of land-use zoning.
-
E.
character1
Indicates that the subject is identified as the first or primary character in a narrative or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d80763bd6c819094437da5b20b01d2 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:09 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97dba57988190b786ffed55687a72 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d97e5811f481908178fac6d2e0efcd |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 8:17 p.m.