Triple
T12952487
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Digamsa Yantra |
E309924
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasReferenceDirection |
P65355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cardinal directions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cardinal directions | Statement: [Digamsa Yantra, hasReferenceDirection, cardinal directions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReferenceDirection Context triple: [Digamsa Yantra, hasReferenceDirection, cardinal directions]
-
A.
hasDirectionReference
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies or points to a directional orientation or reference frame for another entity.
-
B.
hasDirectionType
Indicates that something possesses or is associated with a specific type or category of direction.
-
C.
containsDirectionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses the directional orientation or path associated with another entity.
-
D.
hasRouteDirection
Indicates that a specified route is associated with a particular travel direction (e.g., inbound, outbound, northbound).
-
E.
hasDirectionVariant
Indicates that one entity is a directional variant or orientation-specific form of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdfb57a88190836b743e2825feca |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d97e59a4c88190907d05b8d57dae89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d97dba57988190b786ffed55687a72 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:43 p.m.